Player-made "DEI electronic dog" website allows players to avoid lightning, but it turns into a point-laundering war

Regarding the impact of diversity, also known as DEI (diversity, equity, and inclusion) on games, a Reddit user named Mundane-Cry6751 began making a video called "DEI Gatekeepers" in December. Dog” rating website and was launched as a test on January 1st. However, so far, the sample of player ratings has been very small, showing obvious problems. In addition, you only need to register on this website to evaluate, but the difference in ratings of many games is also obvious. The website is currently under maintenance due to stability issues and has not yet been restored.

　This The rating website was prepared by Mundane-Cry6751 in mid-December. However, as of January 5, no game has more than 50 reviews. The sample number is obviously not enough. His original review of "Dustborn" received a lot of likes and retweets on Twitter, but it also did not attract many players to participate.

　More What’s interesting is that this platform originally wanted to emphasize players’ free evaluation, but it turned out to be a situation of “washing the ratings of works”. The ratings of some games are obviously unreasonable. For example, "Dragon Age: Shadowkeep" scored 4.6 points, "Hogwarts Legacy" scored 0.3 points, "Baldur's Gate 3" scored 2.1 points, and "Zero Zero" scored 6.9 points. "FF14" actually scored as high as 8.6. These ratings seem to have no basis and may be the result of popularity or malicious scoring. The website mentioned in the announcement that it had been taken down for maintenance in order to stabilize the system and solve other problems. There was no further response after more than 6 hours.